Major differences between IFRS/IAS and Austrian accounting regulations
Goodwill
In the case of sustained impairment, the entire goodwill
written
off at its fair value. The valuation is performed at least
once a year by applying a valuation model (impairment test).
No ordinary amortisation of goodwill is performed.
Intangible assets
According to IFRS self-developed intangible assets have
be capitalised, whereas they cannot be capitalised under the
Austrian Business Code.
Land and buildings
Land and buildings, including buildings on third-party land, are
valued according to IAS 16 and also, if so chosen, according
to IAS 40 at book value minus scheduled amortisation. These
are based on the actual duration of use; in accordance with
Austrian Business Code they are mostly also influenced by tax
regulations.
Shares in affiliated and associated companies
Affiliated and associated companies that are not consolidated
fully or at equity due to their minor significance are recognised
at market value.
As a general rule, participating interests are valued at equity
insofar as the company has the opportunity to exercise a considerable
influence. This is assumed, as a matter of principle, for
shares between 20% and 50%. The actual exercising of considerable
influence has no bearing on these figures.
Financial assets
According to IAS 39, a different classification system is applicable
to financial assets. It classifies other securities into the following
categories: held to maturity, available for sale, fair value
through profit or loss (FVTPL). The main valuation difference that
applies
to the other securities available for sale, which account
for the majority of financial assets, as well as the other securities
recorded with effect on income is that these are stated at fair
value on the balance sheet date.
According to the Austrian Business Code, the acquisition costs
constitute the maximum valuation limit.
With regard to the other securities available for sale, the difference
between book value and fair value is treated within the
shareholders funds without affecting income, whereas in the
case of the other securities at fair value through profit or loss, the
difference fully affects income. In contrast, when applying the
strict lower-of-cost-or-market principle in the Austrian Business
Code, depreciation always affects income, even in the case of
a temporary reduction in value and appreciations in line with
the requirement to reinstate original values. In the case of the
mitigated lower-of-cost-or-market principle, the impairment is
not obligatory if the depreciation is only temporary. Expected
permanent impairments, posted as depreciation, affect income
according to both the IFRS and the Austrian Business Code.
Reinsurance
From 2005, the shares of reinsurers in actuarial provisions are
shown on the assets page of the balance sheet in accordance
with IFRS 4.
Acquisition costs
Commissions, as well as other variable costs that are directly
related to the acquisition or extension of existing policies, are
capitalised and distributed over the insurance contract terms
and/or the premium payment period. The deferred acquisition
costs also replace the administrative expense deductions allowed
under the Insurance Supervisory Act for premiums brought forward
in property and casualty insurance.
Actuarial provision
For the calculation of the actuarial provisions in life and health
insurance, regulations deviating from Austrian law apply, which
affect valuation variances as well as the allocation between actuarial
provisions and provisions for premium refunds. In particular,
this refers to the non-application of the zillmerisation of acquisition
costs as well as the integration of the revalued unearned
premiums and real final bonus in the life insurance line.
Health insurance is mainly affected by the deviating interest
rate as well as the application of the most recent parameters,
including safety margins.
Provision for premium refunds and profit sharing
Due to the difference in valuation of the assets and liabilities in
the area of life insurance, a provision has to be made for deferred
profit sharing which complies with the national legal or
contractually regulated profit sharing and is assessed in favour
of the policyholder. The change of the provision for deferred
premium refunds compensates, to a large extent, for the effects
of revaluation on the income statement and thus in the results
for the year.
Provisions for outstanding claims
In accordance with US-GAAP, provisions for outstanding claims
in the property insurance line are basically no longer established
using the principle of caution and on a single-loss basis,
but rather using mathematical procedures based on probable
future compliance amounts.
Provisions for claims equalisation and catastrophes
The establishment of a provision for claims equalisation and catastrophes
is not permitted under IFRS or US-GAAP regulations,
as it does not represent any current obligations to third parties
on the balance sheet date. Accordingly, transfers or releases do
not influence the results for the year.
Pension commitments
The accounting principles used to calculate the pension provision
under IFRS are different from those of the Austrian Business
Code. These are listed in detail in IAS 19. Overall, the individual
differences result in greater detail than under the Austrian
Business Code. This is most notably the result of the use of the
projected unit credit method and of the anticipation of future
demographic and economic developments.
Deferred taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are to be created according to
IAS 12 for temporary differences arising from the comparison
of a stated asset or an obligation using the respective taxable
value. This results in anticipated future tax burdens or relief on
taxes on income (temporary differences), which are to be reported
regardless of the date of their liquidation. According to
Austrian commercial law, deferred taxation is only permissible
as a result of a temporary difference between the commercial
balance sheet profit and the income calculated according to
the tax regulations.
Moreover, according to IAS, deferred taxes for accumulated
losses brought forward and not yet used are to be capitalised
to the extent that they can be used in the future with adequate
probability.